«As a psychosocial powerful, sadomasochism is significantly more slight — and somewhat more pervasive.»
He is a psychologist, in which he states their point of guide for «the literature» in this thesis. This article is not about S&M and causes it to be a point to not sexualize the subject. It really is articles on psychosocial characteristics, maybe not psycho-sexuality.
I do not plan to argue with
I do not plan to argue with you with this one – both in psychological and sexological literatures this is is similar: it relates to discomfort, maybe not control, and it has done for at the very least a hundred years. Calling it a ‘dynamic’ is a weasel term.
But, you may be. plus.
you are incorrect. «Dynamic» has been around the literature that is psychosocial significantly more than a century. Weasel word?–really?
Understand that man Freud along with his writings on sadomasochistic psychosocial dynamics. Hmmm. Your view is actually slim and ill-informed. Cite a source or shut up. Read More